| 1 |
On Friday 17 October 2008, Robert Buchholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 13 October 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > It's a retroactive change to EAPI 0 that requires changes from |
| 4 |
> > package managers and has security implications... Robert isn't |
| 5 |
> > requesting that we specify and mandate existing behaviour here, so |
| 6 |
> > it's not really something that should be left up to PMS to decide |
| 7 |
> > and enforce. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> All package manager developers have implemented this change, and PMS |
| 10 |
> editors have not objected to adding it to the spec. If Ciaran is |
| 11 |
> uncomfortable with adding this change, I would like council to sign |
| 12 |
> off on it. If council will not add this to the agenda, please state |
| 13 |
> so and I hope the PMS folks can add it to the spec without a vote. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Furthermore, what are the blockers to vote on PMS as a draft standard |
| 16 |
> for EAPI=0 ? Is there a timeframe for its ratification? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Has this been discussed in the last council meeting? |
| 19 |
If not, can you please give a reply for the questions above? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Robert |
Archives