Archives
Archives
| From: | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Dropping slotted boost | ||
| Date: | Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:27:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | 509037F1.6060404@flameeyes.eu | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Dropping slotted boost by Michael Mol |
||
| 1 | On 30/10/2012 12:31, Michael Mol wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > I've never understood why Gentoo uses a separate ebuild for it. I mean, |
| 4 | > I can understand some efficiency gains from having a single compiled |
| 5 | > copy, but it shouldn't be surprising in the least when upstream makes |
| 6 | > breaking changes in the API. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Because bundled libraries are bad. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 12 | flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Dropping slotted boost | Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> |