Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zhang Le <r0bertz@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:28:52
Message-Id: 476B401C.3000008@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:56:35 +0800
3 > Zhang Le <r0bertz@g.o> wrote:
4 >> By "all people", I mean all those who have participated in this
5 >> discussion. They shown their concern.
6 >> We should listen to what they said.
7 >
8 > Even when what they said was nonsense
9
10 No nonsense, so far, IMO.
11
12 The question is really simple.
13 Whether we should have two different place to define EAPI?
14 Proponents are trying to prove that we should at least need it be in file name.
15 However so far they are not successful in proving that.
16 They just said you don't understand and you don't need to be able to influence
17 on this decision.
18
19 --
20 Zhang Le, Robert
21 GPG key ID: 1E4E2973
22 Fingerprint: 0260 C902 B8F8 6506 6586 2B90 BC51 C808 1E4E 2973
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) "Bo Ørsted Andresen" <bo.andresen@××××.dk>