1 |
foser posted <1092920607.9405.23.camel@rivendell>, excerpted below, on |
2 |
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:03:27 +0200: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 12:38 +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
5 |
>> If it makes you feel more warm and fuzzy, replace "successful" with |
6 |
>> "used". My point, which you seem to have overlooked, was that if this |
7 |
>> product is not being used, we should not waste the time and resources |
8 |
>> to support it. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> The requirements made make it cost much more time & resources. Just |
11 |
> point devs to the numerous free blogs & let there just be a planet alone |
12 |
> on gentoo.org, then it will be not half as time consuming to set up I |
13 |
> bet. You could eventually add extra's (like on-site blogs) if it works |
14 |
> out. If it doesn't, then nobody will miss it if its gone & it will be |
15 |
> much easier to ditch (just having the planet page gone). |
16 |
|
17 |
As I've been reading the thread, the question that keeps occurring to me |
18 |
is this: Given that some seem skeptical, while others are all gung ho on |
19 |
the idea, and further given that one point repeatedly made by the |
20 |
enthusiastic crowd is that many devs already have a blog (formerly called |
21 |
a public or web journal), we just lack a good public listing of them all |
22 |
(several posts have inferred the poster already has a private list), and |
23 |
that given the public blogging sites out there, a gentoo site for those |
24 |
currently blogless shouldn't be needed.. |
25 |
|
26 |
Why isn't someone just going ahead with an unofficial one? Collect a list |
27 |
of all the devs with current blogs, create a planet (don't call it Gentoo |
28 |
planet yet and violate the trademark, but a privately sponsored Gentoo |
29 |
dev's blogging resource directory, or some such), and populate it with the |
30 |
existing blogs. Mention it in reply to a few user questions in the forums |
31 |
and user list, and see what happens. If the need is as great as it has |
32 |
been made out to be, users will take it from there and it'll soon be |
33 |
apparent that making it official would be worthwhile, making any changes |
34 |
that have become obviously needed by that time when it IS made official. |
35 |
If not, it'll simply languish in obscurity and eventually whoever is |
36 |
putting the effort into it will probably take it down. |
37 |
|
38 |
After all, it's not as if it'd be anything officially Gentoo, and with the |
39 |
appropriate disclaimers, such a list even as a private endeavor would |
40 |
arguably be quite useful. I'm cautiously for the general idea, tho I |
41 |
personally don't do a lot of blog watching or the like, because I expect |
42 |
it'll get a decent number of references on the user list and the like, |
43 |
when people ask about the current and future direction of X ebuild, which |
44 |
happens to have as the active dev someone with an active log page. If I |
45 |
were into such things personally, I'd consider starting such a site |
46 |
myself, and make that my first big contribution to Gentoo. |
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
50 |
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little |
51 |
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- |
52 |
Benjamin Franklin |
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
|
56 |
-- |
57 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |