From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) | ||
Date: | Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:32:15 | ||
Message-Id: | 20071221042653.580193f1@blueyonder.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) by Zhang Le |
1 | On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:20:31 +0800 |
2 | Zhang Le <r0bertz@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > It is not about whether it is agreed upon currently. |
4 | |
5 | It is. That's the entire point of the whole discussion. |
6 | |
7 | > As long as there is an agreement in any given point of time, it is OK. |
8 | > Such as, put your EAPI definition on the first line of your ebuild, |
9 | > like EAPI="value" |
10 | |
11 | No good for package managers written before the agreement. |
12 | |
13 | -- |
14 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) | Zhang Le <r0bertz@g.o> |