Archives
Archives
| From: | Alin Nastac <mrness@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 1.x and GNOME 1.x dependent package masking | ||
| Date: | Tue, 14 Nov 2006 21:58:46 | ||
| Message-Id: | 455A46D1.30203@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 1.x and GNOME 1.x dependent package masking by Daniel Gryniewicz |
||
| 1 | Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: |
| 2 | > We (gnome) are not going to maintain gtk+-1. We would very much prefer |
| 3 | > it get removed. If some other person or group wants to maintain it, I |
| 4 | > guess it's fine with me; it will only cause Jakub and company headaches |
| 5 | > for re-assigning all the bugs that mistakenly get assigned to gnome. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Note that maintaining it basically means being upstream, as there is no |
| 8 | > upstream for it. |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | I have at least one package depending on it. |
| 11 | Feel free to make me the maintainer of the gtk+-1. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 1.x and GNOME 1.x dependent package masking | Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> |