| 1 |
Alin Nastac wrote: |
| 2 |
> Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: |
| 3 |
>> We (gnome) are not going to maintain gtk+-1. We would very much prefer |
| 4 |
>> it get removed. If some other person or group wants to maintain it, I |
| 5 |
>> guess it's fine with me; it will only cause Jakub and company headaches |
| 6 |
>> for re-assigning all the bugs that mistakenly get assigned to gnome. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Note that maintaining it basically means being upstream, as there is no |
| 9 |
>> upstream for it. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> I have at least one package depending on it. |
| 12 |
> Feel free to make me the maintainer of the gtk+-1. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I will join you with that and whatever gnome-1 packages I need for |
| 15 |
gtk-canvas (appears to be gnome-libs, bonobo, gnome-print, oaf, |
| 16 |
gdk-pixbuf). I hope to look into porting gtk-canvas to not require |
| 17 |
gnome-libs so I then only require gtk-1, but I'm not overly optimistic |
| 18 |
on that. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Thanks, |
| 21 |
Donnie |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives