| 1 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:55:42 +0100 |
| 2 |
"Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Am Donnerstag, 23. März 2017, 10:51:01 CET schrieb Alexis Ballier: |
| 5 |
> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:41:39 +0100 |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > Am Dienstag, 21. März 2017, 11:24:39 CET schrieb Andreas K. |
| 9 |
> > > Huettel: |
| 10 |
> > > > So what's so special about your packages that you *need* a hack |
| 11 |
> > > > as ugly as eblits? |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > No response. Seems like there are no real arguments for eblits. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > I guess the argument is not for or against eblit but rather about |
| 16 |
> > "when you want to change something you don't maintain, you have to |
| 17 |
> > justify it properly" |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> No, the argument is about "we want to clean up the tree from abusive |
| 20 |
> hacks". |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
This is yours. Mike's answer is merely asking for proper justification |
| 23 |
and doesn't seem to have had an answer yet. |
Archives