| 1 |
On Thursday 11 November 2004 05:49 pm, Jörg Schaible wrote: |
| 2 |
> please let me know, since when do we have a bug policy for "standard |
| 3 |
> accepted safe use flags"? I don't expect any developer to test a variety of |
| 4 |
> different use flags, but what if a user reports, that a package is |
| 5 |
> seriously broken because of a use flag? In former times a critical flag was |
| 6 |
> just filtered out in the ebuild, but why is such a thing fix now rejected ? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
why not be a little more specific with a Bug # |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
but yes, if a package fails to build due to some combination of USE flags, |
| 11 |
generally it's a bug |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
but not always :P |
| 14 |
for example, the games team provides 'noaudio' 'nojoystick' and 'novideo' USE |
| 15 |
flags ... if you enable them, build libsdl, and then some package fails to |
| 16 |
build, we close it as WONTFIX:YOUR_PROBLEM |
| 17 |
-mike |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives