| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> In anticipation of getting GCC 4.3 stabilized sometime, I'd like to |
| 6 |
> ask maintainers check if their current stable packages build with |
| 7 |
> 4.3, and if not please stabilize a version that does in the near |
| 8 |
> future if at all possible. Stabilizing this version is going to be a |
| 9 |
> huge job due to the number of packages that don't compile due to |
| 10 |
> implicit C++ standard library header dependencies that got cleaned up |
| 11 |
> in 4.3.[i], so anything you could do ahead of time to save our sanity |
| 12 |
> would be greatly appreciated. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Is there a bug that is blocked by such stabilisation requests? We had |
| 15 |
such a thing on the GCC 4 transition (apart from the normal porting |
| 16 |
tracker) and was really handy. I will rebuild three x86 systems (one |
| 17 |
totally stable, two mostly) to check. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
V-Li |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
| 23 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/> |
Archives