Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:38:35 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110423123235.1d618818@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:28:29 +0200 |
| 2 | Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Would it make sense to do the following: |
| 4 | > (1) make all new-style virtuals additionally depend on an old-style |
| 5 | > virtual (a new category might be appropriate) |
| 6 | |
| 7 | No. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? | "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o> |