Archives
Archives
| From: | "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:29:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4DB2D3E4.9080005@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: |
| 2 | > On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:28:29 +0200 |
| 3 | > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | >> Would it make sense to do the following: |
| 6 | >> (1) make all new-style virtuals additionally depend on an old-style |
| 7 | >> virtual (a new category might be appropriate) |
| 8 | >> |
| 9 | > No. |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Because there is a reason for not doing so, or because you think that |
| 13 | multi-repository support is a superior solution which will come sooner? |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Regards, |
| 17 | Chi-Thanh Christopher Nguyen |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |