Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] qt-3.0.4-r1 broken?
Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 10:18:23
Message-Id: 200205251821.37846.danarmak@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] qt-3.0.4-r1 broken? by Jon Nelson
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Saturday 25 May 2002 18:03, Jon Nelson wrote:
5 > On Sat, 25 May 2002 17:57:19 +0300
6 >
7 > Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o> wrote:
8 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
9 > > Hash: SHA1
10 > >
11 > > People have been reporting this all over. The problem is with the lcms
12 > > package, not with qt. For some reason the /usr/lib/liblcms.so.1 ->
13 > > liblcms.so.1.0.8 symlink is missing on some systems. Remerging lcms
14 > > *should* solve the problem. If it doesn't, please report a bug about
15 > > lcms (or look for an already reported one that probably exists).
16 > >
17 > > Could this be an effect of one of those global libtool/whatever
18 > > problems?
19 >
20 > Without knowing exactly what's going on, could this be an artifact
21 > of not having run ldconfig?
22
23 Hm. I know ldconfig is supposed to regenerate those symlinks. OTOH I tried
24 removing the liblcms.so.1 symlink, and running ldconfig didn't recreate it.
25 In any case emerge runs ldconfig all the time, so it can't be missing, can
26 it?
27
28 - --
29 Dan Armak
30 Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
31 Matan, Israel
32 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
33 Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
34
35 iD8DBQE876wBUI2RQ41fiVERAiNLAKCAva8jSkkx9jnaicSobfQQ1B/ZywCfRVph
36 etY+lMCRxpXfQyVHjfihYHY=
37 =2Xfh
38 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] qt-3.0.4-r1 broken? "Michael R. Gayeski" <mrgayeski@×××××××××××××.edu>