| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 10/28/2015 07:23 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Agreed. If there's one choice then "ssl" should be used. |
| 8 |
> openssl/libressl/etc should really be considered sub-flags of ssl. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If we are introducing a new and proper way to define this it might |
| 12 |
make sense to not refer to ssl (is anything actually using SSL these |
| 13 |
days? I certainly hope not), tls is the natural replacement unless we |
| 14 |
want to go for something more generic. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
- -- |
| 17 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 18 |
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 19 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWMK+QAAoJECULev7WN52FFesH/2uEi1vBt5QpR/OEusr2EFVi |
| 23 |
IlkM9+hNNxkFO2pFriB63+iQX90k1+p6jB5X/0ARzXaaL4jfnQlq7XtvBmN6HFvI |
| 24 |
ROBuWIpqtotM6Bm2EKDyDABXxExGcWSNPHPQS4hkyNVSfaredCoQMaweMExDPsip |
| 25 |
Ief8T1R6orqPTv2iDN4Q7uypHUbOi0ogF7r1SAD/CQGL0a9WwFtYVzXBhj90O2F/ |
| 26 |
4OYTnzMirhDtyypPZb++H3J4U2CMm2kcoRtPomXybghTGjuWwz7We2lF61QrNeVA |
| 27 |
IPODRSUDcDPgU8wp2knMGOmKxUQ6Ny8DH9IdQtY4BYdztDYVEV6jCRHGur1gVag= |
| 28 |
=4KHj |
| 29 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives