| 1 |
On 10/28/2015 12:20 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/28/2015 07:23 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Agreed. If there's one choice then "ssl" should be used. |
| 6 |
>> openssl/libressl/etc should really be considered sub-flags of ssl. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If we are introducing a new and proper way to define this it might |
| 10 |
> make sense to not refer to ssl (is anything actually using SSL these |
| 11 |
> days? I certainly hope not), tls is the natural replacement unless we |
| 12 |
> want to go for something more generic. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
That's nitpick for no gain and will break more configurations than any |
| 16 |
of the previously suggested formats. |
Archives