| 1 |
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:57:07 +0500 |
| 2 |
"Anatoly Shipitsin" <norguhtar@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Although I do think you're making a big fuss over a tiny cosmetic |
| 6 |
> > issue. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > This changes need not for sudo. It's need for fcron. And probaly |
| 9 |
> > any |
| 10 |
> package use define editor on configuration stage. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
No, it's not needed for fcron at all, and I already explained why in |
| 13 |
[1]. Progressing through [2-4] I thought the fcron issue might have |
| 14 |
been fixed, but the virtual/editor discussion had started by then and I |
| 15 |
decided I had nothing more to add. Again: fcron builds and works fine |
| 16 |
without at all setting ./configure --with-editor= and the ebuild should |
| 17 |
not set that option at all. Problem solved. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Kind regards, |
| 21 |
JeR |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149376#c15 (don't set |
| 25 |
--with-editor in the ebuild and just let it default to /usr/bin/vi, |
| 26 |
which is only used if your env doesn't have EDITOR set to something |
| 27 |
useful) |
| 28 |
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149376#c17 (where I |
| 29 |
explained that bug #65263 fixed the wrong problem) |
| 30 |
[3] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149376#c19 (where I |
| 31 |
suggested setting it to something proper and available on hopefully |
| 32 |
every system, like --with-editor=/bin/nano) |
| 33 |
[4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149376#c22 (where I |
| 34 |
continued to argue this approach and CC'd bsd@ to get their view) |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives