| 1 |
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:58 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:56:56 +0300 |
| 3 |
> Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > If a parallel install is overwriting things on / whilst a package is |
| 5 |
> > > compiling, things are already horribly broken regardless of this |
| 6 |
> > > switch. PMS explicitly forbids that from happening. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > That's that. And then there's the real world. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Yes, and in the real world, if you change / whilst something is |
| 11 |
> compiling, things break. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Except with dependency tracking they might not. Anyways, I was |
| 14 |
"whatever" on the --disable-dependency-tracking already. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> > > > Olivier Crête also has an outstanding comment about a maintainer |
| 17 |
> > > > possibly not wanting that disabled in case of patches applied. |
| 18 |
> > > > Could use some elaboration on that thought, or comments in |
| 19 |
> > > > replies. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > > It's always possible to override it if necessary. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > No. It is possible to not use econf and write all of the options it's |
| 24 |
> > supposed to be passing manually. Probably missing something or |
| 25 |
> > otherwise being horribly long. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Uh, you just do econf --enable-dependency-tracking. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I apparently did need that nap. Yeah, that should work. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I believe you forgot the topic of --enable-fast-install. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Mart Raudsepp |
| 37 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 38 |
Mail: leio@g.o |
| 39 |
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio |
Archives