| 1 |
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:25:14 +0300 |
| 2 |
Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Yes, and in the real world, if you change / whilst something is |
| 4 |
> > compiling, things break. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Except with dependency tracking they might not. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Disabling dependency tracking will merely change "broken, in a way that |
| 9 |
may or may not end up being visible" to "broken, in a way that may or |
| 10 |
may not (under slightly different parameters) end up being visible. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> I believe you forgot the topic of --enable-fast-install. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Really, I'm in the 'whatever' camp on both of the econf things. I'm |
| 15 |
happy presenting arguments that have already been made, and debunking |
| 16 |
any untrue claims I happen to notice, but beyond that on this one I'm |
| 17 |
happy to just see it go to vote... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives