| 1 |
El lun, 07-02-2011 a las 18:43 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 02/07/2011 06:19 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
| 3 |
> > From time to time there are stabilization bugs where the current stable |
| 4 |
> > is broken. For example, https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353487 |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > However, in theory that should not happen, because presumably the |
| 7 |
> > current stable has been tested in the past and considered not broken. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> In this case, xdm has been broken for more than a year because it has |
| 11 |
> been ignoring pambase by not using system-local-login. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Only the problem came to light after ConsoleKit really started to |
| 14 |
> require this functionality from pambase. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Tricky... |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> But it was still tested, unfortunately the test environment that was |
| 19 |
> used leaked some environment variables that made XDM appear to work, so |
| 20 |
> this was catched too late. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Sorry. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> - Samuli |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I think that maybe we could have an even higher "priority" field called, |
| 29 |
for example, "Broken Stable" that should be *only* used for that cases |
| 30 |
and that arch teams should try fix sooner. What do you think? |
Archives