1 |
On 04/11/2011 03:01 AM, Iain Buchanan wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Since I posted about looking for help[1] I'm sad to say I've barely |
5 |
> touched SynCE. Family commitments have changed, and I'm studying again |
6 |
> for the degree I started 10 years ago! |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I'm therefore asking to be removed as the proxy for Synce. Hopefully |
9 |
> this means it won't die in Gentoo :) |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Massive thanks to everyone who helped with my bad ebuild programming and |
12 |
> testing along the way - volker, mescalinum, ssuominen, the SynCE team |
13 |
> and everyone else. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> The original testing overlay remains here[2] for anyone who wants to |
16 |
> take it over, just contact the SynCE dev team. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> If there are any questions please cc me directly as I may not be on the |
19 |
> -dev list much more. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/69230 |
22 |
> [2] https://synce.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/synce/dist/gentoo |
23 |
> |
24 |
> many thanks! |
25 |
|
26 |
np |
27 |
|
28 |
We should have all of SynCE in Portage again, except for the GNOME bits |
29 |
like synce-trayicon (hardcoded depend on sys-apps/hal) and the KDE bits |
30 |
(haven't even looked). |
31 |
|
32 |
Just by pulling synce-sync-engine as well as synce-connector the deps |
33 |
should get pulled in -> No need for a meta package. |
34 |
|
35 |
The overlay was, when I last checked entirely uncompatible with the |
36 |
packages in tree as well as has confusing amount of deprecated ebuilds. |
37 |
I would love if someone could wipe it clean so people stop accidentally |
38 |
shooting themself in the foot with it. |
39 |
|
40 |
I'll add the synce-trayicon to tree soon as upstream produces a HAL-free |
41 |
version of it... |
42 |
|
43 |
And it's up the KDE team to add the KDE bits if they want. |