| 1 |
That's what most of the responces have pointed out - Gentoo's currrent |
| 2 |
philosophy is to give us all choice to run what we need or desire. |
| 3 |
Unfortunately some people felt we should not have that choice and wanted to |
| 4 |
dump any package that did not meet their approval as free, open, whatever out |
| 5 |
of portage and anyone who wants those packages had to go find them himself. |
| 6 |
Not real tolerant. Gentoo's setup is fine for all and tolerates each side - |
| 7 |
why change it? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On Saturday 22 November 2003 17:52, you wrote: |
| 11 |
> Heiko Vogel wrote: |
| 12 |
> > Does this thread ever reach an end ?! |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> The best this is that instead of trying to enforce a free software only |
| 15 |
> world, eg: RMS, or closed source only world, eg: MS, people should |
| 16 |
> tolerate differing opinions. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Sandy McArthur |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives