| 1 |
On 12/26/2013 02:29 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 12/26/2013 02:27 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:25:04 +0100 |
| 4 |
>> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> That is funny that you mention "cleaning up". I remember last time |
| 6 |
>>> when you broke 8 ebuilds at once because you just trusted your |
| 7 |
>>> outdated repoman warning to be correct. You didn't even file a BUG |
| 8 |
>>> for me, you did not contact me and after I told you that it was wrong |
| 9 |
>>> and that you should revert it, you didn't. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> That's what I call "ignoring the rest". You do not communicate, you do |
| 12 |
>>> not file bugs, you just go and do stuff. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be able to |
| 15 |
>> address. You should raise this issue with them rather than accusing |
| 16 |
>> each other on the lists. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> He is in the QA team. And I don't find it worthwhile doing that thing. I |
| 20 |
> prefer to contact people directly but it seems that did not work out |
| 21 |
> very well. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Well, either fix repoman to not warn, or fix your workflow not to warn. |
| 25 |
I don't find it worthwile doing whatever you're doing, so ... err ... right! |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Fixing stuff (especially cosmetic issues) is faster than filing bugs and |
| 28 |
then waiting between 10 minutes and 10 days for a response. I need to |
| 29 |
cvs up and repoman full anyway, maybe check the Changelog to figure out |
| 30 |
if it's this package that changed or the breakage is because of another |
| 31 |
package (or profiles) changing. So doing an edit and committing is not |
| 32 |
really an unexpected step from there and saves all people involved lots |
| 33 |
of time. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I already file enough bugs, no need to file more bugs to fix issues that |
| 36 |
shouldn't even be there. And don't expect me to keep track of exceptions |
| 37 |
... because then everyone is a special unique snowflake with a good |
| 38 |
reason why breaking the rules is ok for this special case. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
If you ever get bored feel free to work on reducing |
| 41 |
http://packages.gentooexperimental.org/repoman-current-issues.txt |
| 42 |
to an empty list, that'd be, like, greaaat. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
And I'm just going to not consider why you're the only one who NEEDS to |
| 45 |
be special and have repoman not apply ... because that way lies a |
| 46 |
madness I'm not willing to tolerate. |
| 47 |
(AutoRepoman has been running for 5 months now and so far there's only a |
| 48 |
single complaint about me touching packages) |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
Have a divine day, |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
Patrick |
Archives