Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/umurmur: metadata.xml ChangeLog
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:30:08
Message-Id: 52BC2F54.2060605@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/umurmur: metadata.xml ChangeLog by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On 12/26/2013 02:27 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:25:04 +0100
3 > hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
4 >> That is funny that you mention "cleaning up". I remember last time
5 >> when you broke 8 ebuilds at once because you just trusted your
6 >> outdated repoman warning to be correct. You didn't even file a BUG
7 >> for me, you did not contact me and after I told you that it was wrong
8 >> and that you should revert it, you didn't.
9 >>
10 >> That's what I call "ignoring the rest". You do not communicate, you do
11 >> not file bugs, you just go and do stuff.
12 >
13 > That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be able to
14 > address. You should raise this issue with them rather than accusing
15 > each other on the lists.
16 >
17
18 He is in the QA team. And I don't find it worthwhile doing that thing. I
19 prefer to contact people directly but it seems that did not work out
20 very well.

Replies