1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 06/07/11 17:09, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
5 |
> On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 16:47:29 Dane Smith wrote: |
6 |
>> To be perfectly blunt, no small part of what caused this current fiasco |
7 |
>> was this exact attitude. I don't like the current policy either, it's |
8 |
>> far too wide. However, if you go back and look at why it even *got* to |
9 |
>> council, it was because you (and others), decided that they weren't |
10 |
>> going to give any regard to the requests of some of their fellow devs |
11 |
>> about ChangeLogging removals. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> how is this relevant at all ? i dont find value in these entries, other |
14 |
> people do. my attitude towards how worthless they are has 0 bearing on the |
15 |
> policy towards creating it. |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
There never would have been any such policy had people been a little |
19 |
considerate of the requests of others. This could have ended like so: |
20 |
|
21 |
Dev y: "Hey dev x, can you please ChangeLog removals please. I find it |
22 |
very useful." |
23 |
Dev x: "Sure. I don't see use in the information, but if it's going to |
24 |
make your job easier, I'll try to remember to do it." |
25 |
Dev y: "Thanks!" |
26 |
|
27 |
Then this never would have even gotten to council, council never would |
28 |
have passed the current policy, and we never would have gotten to the |
29 |
bloody crapfest that it is now. |
30 |
|
31 |
I personally want people to heed my requests. The only way that will |
32 |
work is if I try to heed others. The only way to work in a community is |
33 |
a little give and take. |
34 |
|
35 |
>> You and I both know that a removal can (and sometimes does) cause breakage. |
36 |
>> These kinds of changes are things that your fellow devs (as well as many |
37 |
>> users) would like to see in ChangeLogs. I do *not* think that this is an |
38 |
>> unreasonable request. I find it to be a little.. inconsiderate I guess, when |
39 |
>> any developer fails to heed a reasonable request from another developer or |
40 |
>> user. I know I personally try to accommodate people if they ask me to do |
41 |
>> something slightly differently to make their lives easier. Why is it that |
42 |
>> you can't do that? Is running echangelog (or hell, scripting something) for |
43 |
>> a removal really that hard or undesirable? Can you really not spare the |
44 |
>> extra 10 seconds? I mean, come on. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> if you want useless information, then automate it. there's no reason at all |
47 |
> to not do so. i prefer to keep useful information in the changelogs of |
48 |
> packages i maintain without cluttering up with noise. |
49 |
|
50 |
Just because you deem it useless doesn't make it so. If someone else |
51 |
sees use in the information, I fail to see why it is such a huge deal to |
52 |
log it. Even if for no other reason than to make someone else's life a |
53 |
bit easier. |
54 |
|
55 |
And yes, it should be automated. I agree. Doesn't change the current |
56 |
situation. |
57 |
|
58 |
Regards, |
59 |
- -- |
60 |
Dane Smith (c1pher) |
61 |
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86 |
62 |
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531&op=index |
63 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
64 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
65 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
66 |
|
67 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN7pbLAAoJEEsurZwMLhUxPTkP/AtB5skbFy9GOOpw1kKEu+jI |
68 |
8z60RD/usXB+TAuHJGKqEDGg8mHzaY7xHMp8PaIoGSzUMGLFHYvnpfkiG1iMzGzF |
69 |
r/F6uLpxpDS35vDHJs5TWMZpiefK8D2SGF/mup68a75R3f7c7+FV2iFUSsJgqq5M |
70 |
iNJGHjzmnGG7utFIO4yRafuSFD1+dn3cZvWjUA6pRvZrMpY+hDRJ9ntuOeqn8CX9 |
71 |
Uw75PXWGEk8ebtR1hewR6sLQWJR1SVucexICCfOHEmLygpM3WJ9mPGxiiOT0iXRD |
72 |
Z7zO5bajoun6lv+xbAW5G4ITpk0s4eqXUQQ9Y1sWMmctXXkbmRn0MeGzK5EEhEen |
73 |
v+L7dRs7ZXjrD+rY+eni87rGNyS/GnUlq6Kx9cuJQJ/OrTB93wu1metnOlOIUH5N |
74 |
oEfvQq3gfsIshxGLmrkuwPZT6FkMxVCmEpyawMc2teSrZXrkHxWRVsW4W8u5+WQp |
75 |
fxp0HcLc4yS8BPTTgrAlT5UI/Tm3qPf+7UhgvH9Sx8AkmMgVD3sUOl38i4wiLvCu |
76 |
VsjRbCQ7tjrjM5VemaBOJzubcg0pbnHd9mhNK/2I1BDQjStb7EeXxiRvxJh61L6C |
77 |
u52mLmgHCvIcxkJkfdmDyl4We1BhvRp8u6lqIDjuxjgm5ge+JA2YtvYyOAYz4Ay4 |
78 |
zwPb45qd/GK9/dGAgtEf |
79 |
=7Ajj |
80 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |