Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Usage of econf with an additional || die | ||
| Date: | Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:58:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1222757758.621.38.camel@localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Usage of econf with an additional || die by Thomas Sachau |
||
| 1 | В Вск, 28/09/2008 в 20:24 +0200, Thomas Sachau пишет: |
| 2 | > I see many ebuild that still use "econf || die", also econf should die by itself. Are there any |
| 3 | > specific reasons for this? Some cases where econf does not die also it fails? Or some other reason |
| 4 | > for this? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | This || die is redundant. Personally I remove it in every package I |
| 7 | touch and I suggest others do the same. People use our tree to learn how |
| 8 | to write ebuilds, so it's good idea to have consistent syntax in our |
| 9 | ebuilds... |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Peter. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Usage of econf with an additional || die | Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Usage of econf with an additional || die | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |