1 |
Private messages and public comments through bugzilla are so far |
2 |
ignored, it seems, so let's try a venue where it's sure to cause a |
3 |
flamewar instead. My apologies for the inconvenience. |
4 |
|
5 |
On Sat, 18 May 2013 21:08:53 +0000 |
6 |
bugzilla-daemon@g.o wrote: |
7 |
|
8 |
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person |
9 |
> whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit: |
10 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470392 |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Bug ID: 470392 |
13 |
> Summary: Please stabilize =dev-libs/libconfig-1.4.9-r1 |
14 |
|
15 |
We agreed a little while ago that bug Summaries should start with an |
16 |
atom, if possible, and explain the action later. Also, robotically |
17 |
filing thousands of bugs and making them say "please" every time isn't |
18 |
going to endear anyone to your cause. So do something like this: |
19 |
|
20 |
"<cat/pkg-version> stabilisation request" |
21 |
|
22 |
> URL: |
23 |
> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/dev-libs/libconfig? arches=linux |
24 |
|
25 |
Is this URL useful to include, or did you just want to abuse every |
26 |
last feature found in pybugz? Wouldn't maintainers already know where |
27 |
to find this kind of information? Who do you think is your audience? |
28 |
|
29 |
> OS: Linux |
30 |
> Status: CONFIRMED |
31 |
> Severity: enhancement |
32 |
|
33 |
Is a stabilisation an enhancement per se? If all stabilisations are |
34 |
enhancements, then why isn't Severity set to Normal instead? (What is |
35 |
an enhanced severity to begin with, Mozilla?) |
36 |
|
37 |
> Priority: Normal |
38 |
|
39 |
This is where you probably wanted to set something similar to |
40 |
Enhancement above, but again you probably shouldn't. Normal |
41 |
stabilisation bugs are normal, not less than normal. |
42 |
|
43 |
> Is it OK to stabilize =dev-libs/libconfig-1.4.9-r1 ? |
44 |
> |
45 |
> If so, please CC all arches which have stable keywords |
46 |
> |
47 |
> for older versions of this package and add STABLEREQ keyword |
48 |
> |
49 |
> to the bug. |
50 |
|
51 |
My e-mail editor is messing up the line endings here, but your messages |
52 |
already include double newlines - on bugzilla web pages as well as in |
53 |
the e-mail it sends, so this is your broken pybugz script again, I |
54 |
reckon? |
55 |
|
56 |
Also, your script does not set the STABLEREQ keyword. People are having |
57 |
to hunt down your robo-stabilisation requests and add it themselves. |
58 |
You should just do it yourself or turn your script off. |
59 |
|
60 |
|
61 |
jer |