1 |
On Sun, 19 May 2013 15:40:27 +0200 |
2 |
Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > OS: Linux |
5 |
> > Status: CONFIRMED |
6 |
> > Severity: enhancement |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Is a stabilisation an enhancement per se? If all stabilisations are |
9 |
> enhancements, then why isn't Severity set to Normal instead? (What is |
10 |
> an enhanced severity to begin with, Mozilla?) |
11 |
|
12 |
Huh? The severity of the bug is it's an enhancement. |
13 |
|
14 |
Yes stabilizations are enhancements. Always have been. |
15 |
|
16 |
> Also, your script does not set the STABLEREQ keyword. People are having |
17 |
> to hunt down your robo-stabilisation requests and add it themselves. |
18 |
> You should just do it yourself or turn your script off. |
19 |
|
20 |
Did you read the message? The point is you're supposed to add that yourself. |
21 |
It's not a STABLEREQ until you add arches. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk |
26 |
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org |
27 |
|
28 |
47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 |