| 1 |
begin quote |
| 2 |
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 12:21:33 +0100 |
| 3 |
Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Sunday 23 November 2003 00:34, foser wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 00:06, Spider wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > My super-secret plan is this: |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > <super-secret plan> |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > > Ain't It much better? ;) |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > No, it's the same idea the other way around. As mentioned earlier : |
| 14 |
> > in most cases it was meant as a transition flag. Transition done ? |
| 15 |
> > Make the stable and maintained UI default. One gtk flag to own them |
| 16 |
> > all. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> What about mozilla. The gtk2 version of galeon is certainly not yet up |
| 20 |
> to par with the gtk1 version. I certainly want to be able to continue |
| 21 |
> to use the gtk1 galeon. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Mozilla will keep with its gtk 1.2 UI until all things who depend on it |
| 24 |
are ready. Galeon 1.3 is still under development and masked, so it will |
| 25 |
not superseed the old galeon. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
However , when gtk2 is the default USE flag we need to implement the |
| 28 |
check from galeon 1.3 and epiphany into Galeon. (gtk version) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I dont intend to destroy the tree out of folly, even if it would be very |
| 32 |
nice to rip out all "legacy" code ;-) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
//Spider |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
begin .signature |
| 37 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 38 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 39 |
end |
Archives