1 |
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:29:01AM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
2 |
Content-Description: signed data |
3 |
> Well, that *is* how other fields of human endeavour have to work. They just |
4 |
> seem to have found a more balanced way to dealing with it. |
5 |
|
6 |
No, other fields work on implementations, not ideas or concepts. You patent a |
7 |
certain _implementation_ of a combustion engine, not the *idea* or *concept* |
8 |
of a combustion engine. |
9 |
|
10 |
The first is what I totally agree on, implementations can be protected. The |
11 |
latter I totally disagree on, concepts/ideas have no need for protection. |
12 |
|
13 |
> But to simply say that there shouldn't be any form of protection for IPR isn't |
14 |
> a position I'm willing to agree with. |
15 |
|
16 |
For software, copyright and licensing are two strong IP protection measures |
17 |
that are both firm and without high costs. And you can even choose to close |
18 |
your software (no open source) if you want to make sure that no-one illegally |
19 |
steals/uses it. |
20 |
|
21 |
Wkr, |
22 |
Sven Vermeulen |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
^__^ And Larry saw that it was Perfect. |
27 |
(oo) Sven Vermeulen |
28 |
(__) http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Documentation Project |