1 |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 10/13/2011 02:27 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
3 |
>> Mike Frysinger schrieb: |
4 |
>>>> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time. |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the tree |
7 |
>>> with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the depgraph. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I'm not sure if you should have gentoo-x86 access anymore... This is scary. |
12 |
|
13 |
Come on. That's ridiculous, and nothing but trolling. Don't do that. |
14 |
|
15 |
Like in the pngcrush thread, miscommunications all around. |
16 |
|
17 |
Matt |