Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Peter Volkov (pva)" <pva@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Resolve build time default editor dependency. (was: How get ebuild provider virtual/category.)
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:34:09
Message-Id: 1163330966.10331.120.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Resolve build time default editor dependency. (was: How get ebuild provider virtual/category.) by Mike Frysinger
1 On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 05:54 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > in the example usages you cited, people where using `sudo` to just
3 > avoid running `su -` first ... in other words, their sudo was
4 > unlimited ... updating the sudoers file to allow EDITOR via env_keep
5 > would work fine for them
6 >
7 > in that scenario, running any app via EDITOR is not a concern as they
8 > already have the ability to run any command
9
10 That is right. And I've already raised concerns about this approach in
11 my mail:
12 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/44218/focus=44238
13
14 And that is not an answer on question I've asked in this sub-thread:
15
16 Do you know any way *how* to specify "safe" editors list inside sudoers?
17
18 I've spent some time and did not found how can I force sudo to edit
19 files with only known editors inside EDITOR. env_keep just keep env
20 variable and does not allow to specify "safe" editors list. I suppose
21 that this is impossible.
22
23 Or... what do you mean by that:
24 "the sudo file has the ability to specify editor's, so why not tell
25 people to change their sudo config file ?"
26
27 English is not my native language thus may be I just misunderstood your
28 idea here. Sorry.
29
30 Peter.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies