| 1 |
Alexandre Buisse wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 13:44:52 +0100, sanchan wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>>Hi all, I'm working on TinyOS related ebuilds (Bug #78908) and since |
| 6 |
>>actually there are 20 ebuilds in my overlay may be worth proposing a |
| 7 |
>>dev-tos category. |
| 8 |
>>It will take a few weeks in order to have all the ebuilds updated for the |
| 9 |
>>new release of tinyos, have them reviewed by peer an committed to the tree, |
| 10 |
>>but it's a lot easier to make a category early rather than moving stuff. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I don't know TinyOS, but I assume it is a "toy OS", like minix and many others. |
| 14 |
> What about a dev-toyos category? It could be great to have some other |
| 15 |
> toy OS, including the one I have been working on (funk, see |
| 16 |
> http://home.gna.org/funk/), but also, if licences allow it, plan9, |
| 17 |
> minix3, coyotos, l4 and so on. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I do not have ebuilds for any of them but could help make some if people |
| 20 |
> agree that it could be useful. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Regards, |
| 23 |
> Alexandre |
| 24 |
Actually, TinyOS is a good operating system for small embedded design.. |
| 25 |
having the ebuilds somewhere in portage could be a good idea.. maybe |
| 26 |
dev-alternateos ? qnx could also go in there.. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Best regards, |
| 29 |
Tomasz |
Archives