Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Spider <spider@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why not vi?
Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 14:30:30
Message-Id: 20020526213016.4d344af9.spider@inaudio.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why not vi? by wes chow
1 begin quote
2 On Sat, 25 May 2002 11:38:23 -0400 (EDT)
3 wes chow <wes@×××××××××.net> wrote:
4
5 >
6 > #0 0x400495aa in tgoto () from /lib/libncurses.so.5
7 > #1 0x0805856a in getline ()
8 > #2 0x08049fad in strcpy ()
9 > #3 0x4007e3bd in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
10 >
11 > Is there anything you need to know about my system?
12 >
13 >
14 Wow! finally a backtrace!!! : )
15
16 is this a gcc3 system? If it is, which ncurses verison? well, you can
17 tell me that anyhow ;)
18
19 Can you file a bug with :
20 Gunnar Ritter
21 <g-r@×××××××.de>
22 <http://ex-vi.berlios.de>
23
24 As he is the current maintainer of vi?
25 //Spider
26
27 --
28 begin .signature
29 This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
30 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
31 end

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why not vi? wes chow <wes@×××××××××.net>