Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: wes chow <wes@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why not vi?
Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 19:46:10
Message-Id: 20020526204147.T46109-100000@hitchcock.woahnelly.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why not vi? by Spider
1 I'm running gcc 2.95.3 with ncurses 5.2-r5.
2
3 Okay, I'll file the bug... It's strange that it only seg faults in text
4 mode. Why is that? Does the ncurses library change depending on whether
5 you're in Gnome? It seems to me that this might be a ncurses bug and not
6 a vi one.
7
8
9 Wes
10
11
12
13 On Sun, 26 May 2002, Spider wrote:
14
15 > begin quote
16 > On Sat, 25 May 2002 11:38:23 -0400 (EDT)
17 > wes chow <wes@×××××××××.net> wrote:
18 >
19 > >
20 > > #0 0x400495aa in tgoto () from /lib/libncurses.so.5
21 > > #1 0x0805856a in getline ()
22 > > #2 0x08049fad in strcpy ()
23 > > #3 0x4007e3bd in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
24 > >
25 > > Is there anything you need to know about my system?
26 > >
27 > >
28 > Wow! finally a backtrace!!! : )
29 >
30 > is this a gcc3 system? If it is, which ncurses verison? well, you can
31 > tell me that anyhow ;)
32 >
33 > Can you file a bug with :
34 > Gunnar Ritter
35 > <g-r@×××××××.de>
36 > <http://ex-vi.berlios.de>
37 >
38 > As he is the current maintainer of vi?
39 > //Spider
40 >
41 > --
42 > begin .signature
43 > This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
44 > See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
45 > end
46 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why not vi? wes chow <wes@×××××××××.net>