| 1 |
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 26 May 2013 15:15:26 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Cc: TomWij@g.o |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Please don't CC me, this causes duplicate mails; one of both does not |
| 8 |
> include reply-to. Nobody else that has responded to me did this before. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Unless you can give me an awesome procmail rule to process these... :) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
:0 Wh: msgid.lock |
| 14 |
| formail -D 8192 msgid.cache |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
:0 a: |
| 17 |
.duplicates/new |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
(or /dev/null as you prefer) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I'm sure it isn't perfect, but I've been running it for years. |
| 22 |
Between lists and aliases I'd be buried in dups otherwise. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Apologies for the OT, but I figured this was useful, and you did ask... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Rich |
Archives