1 |
On 15-09-2008 13:20:23 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
2 |
> > For future EAPIs, ARCH could be a regular USE_EXPANDed flag as you |
3 |
> > suggest, and package managers could filter any flag in USE which is |
4 |
> > not listed in IUSE. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> While I don't necessarily disagree with you, my impression is that |
7 |
> most people tend to think that certain profile-specific flags such |
8 |
> as userland_* and kernel_* should be considered as implicit members |
9 |
> of IUSE and therefore they shouldn't be explicitly listed in in IUSE. |
10 |
|
11 |
Yes, IMO mainly because they should never explicitly be set by users, so |
12 |
they shouldn't get a hint they can set it either. |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Fabian Groffen |
17 |
Gentoo on a different level |