1 |
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 14:56 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
2 |
> I would like to take this time to note and re-affirm the proper bug |
3 |
> assignment policy and have it noted somewhere officially in Gentoo Policy. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Bugs that are created for the purpose of getting arches to keyword or |
6 |
> stabilize a particular package should initially be assigned to the |
7 |
> herd/maintainer of said package with all requested arches being CCed. |
8 |
> Once all but the last arch has keyworded said package, it is acceptable |
9 |
> and proper for a bug wrangler and/or maintainer/herd to re-assign the |
10 |
> bug to the last remaining arch and they remove that arch from CC. They |
11 |
> should add their herd/maintainer to the CC of the bug. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Once the last remaining arch has completed the bug, it is up to them to |
14 |
> close it. They know it's up to them to close it since the bug is |
15 |
> assigned directly to them. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> This helps keep bugzilla tidy and makes it easy to identify |
18 |
> stabilization/keywording requests which are a priority for that arch to |
19 |
> take care of. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
This is in direct conflict with the security bug policy handling which |
23 |
end up putting the maintainer on the CC: along with the arches. |
24 |
|
25 |
Also please don't cross post. |
26 |
|
27 |
-solar |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |