Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:06:55
Message-Id: 20130926150644.31b31070@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:53:14 +0100
2 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:53:53 -0300
5 > Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote:
6 > > please spend your time on something useful:
7 > > fix bug #449094 and bug #462138 or propose something you think
8 > > better for fixing the problems those bugs describe.
9 >
10 > Those are both an awful lot of work for a very minimal gain for a very
11 > small number of packages.
12
13 those more or less are what is needed to have subslots working nicely
14 for the (counter)examples in this thread
15
16
17 > > subslots are far from perfect atm
18 >
19 > But they're much better than not having them, and they're probably as
20 > good as you're going to get any time soon.
21
22 if you waste your time trolling like in the other thread some
23 weeks/months ago then yes nothing else but trolling will happen.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>