Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:21:54
Message-Id: 50A89A73.3050709@flameeyes.eu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] by Greg KH
1 On 18/11/2012 00:08, Greg KH wrote:
2 > But if this fork is now the "official Gentoo fork", owned by the Gentoo
3 > Foundation, and it's the way forward that Gentoo the distro is going to
4 > take with regards to how the boot process works on the system, then I
5 > have something to say about it, as it affects me, a Gentoo developer.
6
7 Please note that I would be the first one, from a QA point of view, to
8 raise a huge question mark if somebody is planning to make this the
9 default anytime soon.
10
11 You want to keep it around as an option? Sure, feel free.
12
13 Moving as default? Over my dead public key.
14
15 --
16 Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
17 flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Replies