| 1 |
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 2 |
<ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:46:55 +0200 |
| 4 |
<large snip> |
| 5 |
> What's the scope of the changes? I think it'd be easiest to discuss |
| 6 |
> this if you posted an informal summary describing the differences in |
| 7 |
> terms of which bits of PMS are affected. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Ciaran, others: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
In a way I feel like we (the Prefix project) are mis-using the EAPI |
| 12 |
value. If we have something that is designed to work with *any* EAPI, |
| 13 |
is it really a special EAPI? haubi said something on the gentoo-alt |
| 14 |
list that made me think about this more: |
| 15 |
"When an usecase of something is orthogonal to what that thing is |
| 16 |
designed for, one should consider using a different thing for this |
| 17 |
usecase." -source unknown |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Is this PROPERTIES-like information? Is that easily supportable in the PM? |
Archives