1 |
>>>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> Currently RESTRICT=mirror and RESTRICT=bindist are independent of |
4 |
>> each other. I wonder if the former should imply the latter. |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Is there any package where the files in SRC_URI cannot be mirrored |
7 |
>> (i.e., redistributed), but where the built package can be |
8 |
>> distributed? |
9 |
|
10 |
> i've used RESTRICT=mirror in the past when the files were really |
11 |
> large (like games or toolchain source tarballs) and upstream already |
12 |
> had a good mirroring system. in both cases, there was no binary |
13 |
> redistribution restrictions. |
14 |
|
15 |
> so my answer would be no: we have two independent knobs and let's |
16 |
> keep them that way. |
17 |
|
18 |
Right. And as was pointed to me on IRC, another legitimate case for |
19 |
mirror restriction are packages in overlays whose distfiles are not on |
20 |
mirrors. Then it obviously makes no sense to check mirrors for it. |
21 |
|
22 |
Ulrich |