| 1 |
On Friday 26 April 2013 15:23:42 Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
> >>>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> >> Currently RESTRICT=mirror and RESTRICT=bindist are independent of |
| 4 |
> >> each other. I wonder if the former should imply the latter. |
| 5 |
> >> |
| 6 |
> >> Is there any package where the files in SRC_URI cannot be mirrored |
| 7 |
> >> (i.e., redistributed), but where the built package can be |
| 8 |
> >> distributed? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > i've used RESTRICT=mirror in the past when the files were really |
| 11 |
> > large (like games or toolchain source tarballs) and upstream already |
| 12 |
> > had a good mirroring system. in both cases, there was no binary |
| 13 |
> > redistribution restrictions. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > so my answer would be no: we have two independent knobs and let's |
| 16 |
> > keep them that way. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Right. And as was pointed to me on IRC, another legitimate case for |
| 19 |
> mirror restriction are packages in overlays whose distfiles are not on |
| 20 |
> mirrors. Then it obviously makes no sense to check mirrors for it. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
ah, yeah, we do this a lot in ChromiumOS |
| 23 |
-mike |
Archives