| 1 |
Mike Frysinger napsal(a): |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 10 January 2007 09:34, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Huh? I was referring to this link [1] on Bug 161045 (which presumably |
| 4 |
>> started this whole debate) |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> so you're replying to a non-gentoo-dev thread on a gentoo-dev thread when the |
| 7 |
> threads arent even closely related ? how does that make sense ? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> this thread has nothing to do with commercial packages |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
No, it does not. And RESTRICT=sandbox is still completely unneeded, |
| 12 |
commercial packages or not... We don't need to introduce a special |
| 13 |
RESTRICT because of two borked packages in the tree and we should not |
| 14 |
introduce any more packages borked in a similar way into the tree. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Best regards, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Jakub Moc |
| 21 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 22 |
GPG signature: |
| 23 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 24 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives