| 1 |
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 19:03, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger napsal(a): |
| 3 |
> > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 09:34, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Huh? I was referring to this link [1] on Bug 161045 (which presumably |
| 5 |
> >> started this whole debate) |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > so you're replying to a non-gentoo-dev thread on a gentoo-dev thread when |
| 8 |
> > the threads arent even closely related ? how does that make sense ? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > this thread has nothing to do with commercial packages |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> No, it does not. And RESTRICT=sandbox is still completely unneeded, |
| 13 |
> commercial packages or not... We don't need to introduce a special |
| 14 |
> RESTRICT because of two borked packages in the tree and we should not |
| 15 |
> introduce any more packages borked in a similar way into the tree. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I agree. The restrict should only be even considered when it is clear that the |
| 18 |
sandbox is indeed flawed by concept and cannot be fixed. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Paul |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 24 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 25 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 26 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives