| 1 |
On 01/11/15 23:07, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 11/01/2015 12:44 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: |
| 3 |
>> There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for pull |
| 4 |
>> requests and code review and such, so I have set up a Phabricator |
| 5 |
>> instance against gentoo.git to see how a free alternative might work. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> ... |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> What do you think? |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Thanks for working on this. I personally didn't like Phabricator very |
| 13 |
> much when I used it, but I'm glad someone is trying out code review |
| 14 |
> platforms. I could live with it. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Most of the code-review platforms are cumbersome and inefficient |
| 17 |
depending on the purpose. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Phab has some nice ideas (gamification is one of them), but overall I |
| 20 |
feel interacting with it less pleasant than interacting with github and |
| 21 |
gitlab (both have different defects). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Personally I wouldn't mind having a gitlab setup if there is consensus |
| 24 |
in going in that direction. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
If we want to try to do something more simple, patchwork or plaid (from |
| 27 |
truly yours =p) might be options as well. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
lu |
Archives