| 1 |
On Monday 09 February 2009 04:33:54 Tobias Klausmann wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 02 Feb 2009, Tobias Klausmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> > If it works, I'll test drive it for a while and report back. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I've been running a patched glibc-2.9_p20081201-r1 for a week |
| 6 |
> now. Nothing broke and I've been unable to trigger the lost |
| 7 |
> packet syndrome by using getaddrinfo(). I was still able to |
| 8 |
> produce it by sending UDP packets myself, but that was to be |
| 9 |
> expected. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> So in essence, the patch I mentioned "works". We could use it |
| 12 |
> should we want to have a glibc 2.9. On the bug mentioned earlier |
| 13 |
> (where I got the patch from), one of the glibc guys mentions that |
| 14 |
> more work is planned for the resolver part of glibc, so this |
| 15 |
> whole ordeal may pass us. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
that patch is already in the glibc patchset, i just havent released it yet. |
| 18 |
guess i could do that this weekend. |
| 19 |
-mike |
Archives