1 |
On 2011.02.07 20:50, Markos Chandras wrote: |
2 |
[snip] |
3 |
|
4 |
> My suggestion, as I said to fosdem, is to freeze, or take a |
5 |
> snapshot if you like, of the current tree, stabilize what you need to |
6 |
> stabilize, test the whole tree ( at least compile wise ) for a couple |
7 |
> of weeks and then replace the existing stable tree. Of course this |
8 |
> requires automated script testing, hardware facilities etc etc that |
9 |
> we don't have so claiming that stable tree is "stable" is quite |
10 |
> wrong. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Regards, |
13 |
> -- |
14 |
> Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
Markos, |
18 |
|
19 |
This is exactly what releng used to do for installer CDs. This was |
20 |
last used for 2008.0 CD/DVD. A snapshot of the stable tree was taken in |
21 |
February 200.8 and the release hit the mirrors in September. |
22 |
|
23 |
The seven month test/fix/retest that it took meant that the CD would |
24 |
not boot on new hardware as the kernel lacked drivers. |
25 |
|
26 |
You will find similar lags when releng used this approach for other |
27 |
earlier releases. |
28 |
|
29 |
We would need to move to a release cycle like the kernel. Calling a |
30 |
feature freeze at the start of the test cycle. As we can't everything, |
31 |
we might as well distribute binaries of what was tested - just as |
32 |
releng used to do. |
33 |
|
34 |
To me thats not Gentoo as we would loose the rolling updates. |
35 |
|
36 |
There are degrees of stable. I believe most Gentoo users |
37 |
realise this fairly early on and stick with Gentoo because they like |
38 |
the balance it strikes between Debian stable and bleeding edge. |
39 |
There is a price to pay for being more up to date and it a trade off |
40 |
Gentoo users are aware off. Of course, that does not prevent them |
41 |
bringing breakages to our attention. |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
Regards, |
45 |
|
46 |
Roy Bamford |
47 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
48 |
gentoo-ops |
49 |
forum-mods |
50 |
trustees |