| 1 |
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 01:06:05AM -0600, Matthew Kennedy wrote: |
| 2 |
> Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:16:19AM -0600, Matthew Kennedy wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> Personally, I am only interested in supporting and using free |
| 6 |
> >> software, so... |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> The best solution is just to remove support for anything non-free in |
| 9 |
> >> portage and to also remove any non-free software from our mirrors. |
| 10 |
> >> Let some other external project step up to the plate and provide a |
| 11 |
> >> non-free overlay if they wish. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > I disagree. Give the users who want the chance to not use "non-free" |
| 14 |
> > software, but also give the others the chance to use non-free software. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > I think you'll get a lot of gamers against you when you tell them you don't |
| 17 |
> > want them to easily install their favorite non-free game :) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> [...] |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Jon, Sven, |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Obviously, its more important that the "gamers" are not upset by a |
| 24 |
> single line change in make.conf. The principle of building a Free |
| 25 |
> software distribution has got to be less important than that. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
And because I forgot to mention it in my previous mail... |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
You were not suggesting making people make a single line change. You |
| 31 |
were suggesting forcing all nonfree software out of the tree. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 35 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives