Archives
Archives
| From: | Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure | ||
| Date: | Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:40:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | 87smkdk9l9.fsf@killr.ath.cx | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure by Jon Portnoy |
||
| 1 | Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | [...] |
| 5 | |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > You were not suggesting making people make a single line change. You |
| 8 | > were suggesting forcing all nonfree software out of the tree. |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | |
| 11 | [...] |
| 12 | |
| 13 | No i think if you read properly you'll find out that I put forward |
| 14 | what I personally believe is the best solution, and then went on to |
| 15 | support the ACCEPT_LICENSES solution. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Matt |
| 18 | |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | Matthew Kennedy |
| 21 | Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 22 | |
| 23 | -- |
| 24 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |