Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 10:39:30
Message-Id: 20200426033924.6b4a2148@storm
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation by "Toralf Förster"
1 On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 11:32:06 +0200
2 Toralf Förster <toralf@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 4/26/20 11:09 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
5 > > Instead of using the IP address, you could generate a UUID when
6 > > installing the tool.
7 >
8 > like the pfl tool did ?
9 >
10
11 Like the last gentoostats gsoc project did.
12
13 As for enterprise/school/multiple clone deployments. Those are
14 generated by one person/team, then deployed. We would need that
15 person/team to only enable their test system for gentoostats/disabled
16 for deployments. Repeated failure to do that could result in that uuid
17 being blacklisted. Part of the initial profile details for that
18 vm/image would be some details about approx numbers of deployments
19 (yes, subject to change. But useful to know whether it is 10-15 or
20 100-500. type of deployment ie: vm/docker/kubernetes/desktop/server...

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o>